Irrelevant to the current event.
Why would you thing there can only be one reason?
It's like saying someone can't be found guilty of murder because some different case has gone unsolved.
FACTS:
1) CO2 , among others, is a green house gas
2) we put billions of tons of CO2 in the air
3) the temperature change is no top of normal cycle
4) every other other possible reason has been shut down.
5) the organisations the it will hurt the most are agreeing with the evidence.
Never, ever, ever quote something from the register. For or against, it's a horrible rag .
No model is perfect. But looking at the whole scope of events and denying them because of events like these is stupid. In fact, it's the very base of cognitive dissonance.
Did you read the study? I assume not because then you would know how stupid it is to quote the article.
Explain to me how this means there isn't man made global warming:
~~
The mechanisms by which heat is delivered to Antarctic ice shelves are a major source of uncertainty when assessing the response of the Antarctic ice sheet to climate change. Direct observations of the ice shelf-ocean interaction are extremely scarce, and present ice shelf-ocean models struggle to predict reason able melt rates. Our two years of data during 2010-2012 from three oceanic moorings below the Fimbul Ice Shelf in the eastern Weddell Sea show cold cavity waters, with average temperatures of less than 0.1 {degree sign}C above the surface freezing point. This suggests rather low basal melt rates, consistent with remote sensing based, steady state mass balance estimates in this sector of the Antarctic coast. Oceanic heat for basal melting is found to be sup-plied by two sources of warm water that enter below the ice: (i) eddy-like bursts of Modified Warm Deep Water accesses the cavity at depth during eight months of the record; and (ii) a seasonal inflow of warm, fresh surface water flushes parts of the ice base with temperatures above freezing, during late summer and fall. This interplay of processes implies that basal melting cannot simply be parameterized by coastal deep ocean temperatures, but is directly linked to both solar forcing at the surface as well as to coastal processes controlling deep ocean heat fluxes.
~~
Cherry picking data is bad, but cherry picking wrong data is
lower then expected is not 'flat wrong'.
Do you even understand what a model it?
Lets be clear about that letter:
1) Melting not as fast.
2) In no way throws gloabale warming out the window.
" block them from your mind"
fuck you and your LOL.
gavin degraw gavin degraw alec time 100 bob beckel anna paquin warren buffett
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.